Randy Crosson had 鈥渄etermined, angry, rage-filled eyes鈥� in his last seconds, using his girlfriend as a shield as police fired more than 30 bullets in their direction.

Bedlam had already erupted in the small bedroom as Const. Brent Wantke followed his fellow Emergency Response Team members in. Crosson, 48, had a gun to Nona McEwan鈥檚 chest, she screamed, and the bullets flew. Wantke didn鈥檛 fire his, for fear of hitting the other ERT officers before him.

鈥淭he hostage was brought to the kitchen,鈥� he said, for medical help. Wantke did a 鈥渨et check鈥� on Const. Darcy Rowe, to make sure he wasn鈥檛 hit. 鈥淚t was very crowded.鈥�

鈥淭hey were in super, super tight,鈥� he said. 鈥淚 couldn鈥檛 see the paint on the wall, that鈥檚 how close they were.

鈥淚 couldn鈥檛 say how many rounds came from who.鈥�

At the four-minute mark into Crosson鈥檚 five-minute warning, the six ERT officers were authorized to go in. 鈥淲e believed that the suspect was going to imminently kill the hostage,鈥� he said. 鈥滿y role was to simply save the hostage any way possible.鈥�

Wantke had been with ERT for four months at the time.

Rowe, the second officer to enter the room, fired his gun. He too recalled the terrifying scene, testifying Friday (April 19) during a coroner鈥檚 inquest into the deaths of Crosson and McEwan, 45, both killed by police during the March 29, 2019 hostage-taking in the Whalley house she rented.

Coroner Margaret Janzen is presiding over the inquest in Burnaby, at Coroners鈥� Court. It鈥檚 expected to run for two weeks, with a jury of four women and a man hearing testimony.

Urgency and stress were clear in Rowe鈥檚 voice as he recounted the horror.

Smoke and debris hung in the air from the strip charge police used to blast the bedroom door open. A stream of light shone through the window onto the bed. Crosson was 鈥渟eated up鈥� in the darkness at the corner of the bed, with McEwan on top of him, and he was holding her around her neck.

鈥淚 could see the movements of Miss McEwan鈥檚 hair,鈥� Rowe said. 鈥淚 knew that I had to get closer.鈥�

Crosson pointed his gun at Rowe鈥檚 partners. 鈥淚 see his eyes and he has determined, angry, rage-filled, eyes as he starts pointing out towards my partners. I know now that there鈥檚 a bunch of debris in the doorway which has started to tangle in my feet. I鈥檓 trying to now get to that contact shot as I鈥檝e seen this change. I now realize that I can鈥檛 get to that, but I have to do something in order to stop this threat. I believe that Miss McEwan鈥檚 on top of him, as the shield, I take this as a chance to twist and shoot under and hit him in such a way that it will change his behaviour. As I fire, I鈥檓 starting to go down from all the debris I鈥檝e been caught up in, the weight of my vest and helmet take me down, and in that instant there鈥檚 a moment of fabric and everything which becomes in my view which hadn鈥檛 been, and I can鈥檛 understand what happened. At that point I come to rest on the corner of the bed.鈥�

Multiple rounds are going off. 鈥淚鈥檓 stuck on that corner of the bed, laying partially down against it.鈥�

The firing stops but 鈥渢he yelling and screaming and everything continues, I鈥檓 grabbed, people believe I鈥檓 shot.鈥�

Rowe got pulled out of the room, taken out of the house through the front and to a vehicle. 鈥淚 don鈥檛 see what has happened and transpired within the room, I don鈥檛 know the status of Miss McEwan, Mr. Crosson or my teammates at that point.鈥�

Rowe said he fired two rounds. Asked how many gunshots he heard, Rowe told the inquest 鈥渄ozens, there was probably more than 30 rounds fired鈥� from different firearms.

A Surrey-based police watchdog 鈥� the Independent Investigations Office 鈥� in 2020 found the ERT blameless in the shooting deaths. The standoff saw roughly two dozen police vehicles, as well as an armoured vehicle, descend on the home in a cul-de-sac near 132A Street and 100A Avenue.

Both officers were asked if the phenomenon of sympathetic fire occurred, when officers shoot because others are. 鈥淣o, absolutely not,鈥� Wantke told the jury.

Rowe said he couldn鈥檛 speak to what the other officers did. 鈥淚 know what I saw and what I reacted to, I don鈥檛 know what their risk assessment was at that point or what they saw, so I can鈥檛 speak to that, no.鈥�

The inquest continues.