琉璃神社

Skip to content

Kearl oilsands leak exposes gaps in how Alberta and Canada oversee industry: experts

Problem discovered in May, but not reported until February
32106474_web1_20230310180328-90fb1debf3aa57275bd02618a9562e4bb78dfbf793033c4a6a769cd2d4b0aa8a
Tailings samples are being tested during a tour of Imperial鈥檚 oil sands research centre in Calgary, Alta., Tuesday, Aug. 28, 2018. Recent leaks of toxic tailings from northern Alberta oilsands mines have revealed serious flaws in how Canada and Alberta look after the environment, observers say. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Jeff McIntosh

Recent leaks of toxic tailings from northern Alberta oilsands mines have revealed serious flaws in how Canada and Alberta look after the environment, observers say.

Some accuse the federal government of abandoning the province. Others point to what they call a captive provincial regulator. All agree that there鈥檚 no way leaks from Imperial Oil鈥檚 Kearl tailings ponds should have gone unreported for nine months to both Ottawa and Edmonton, as well as the people who live near it.

鈥淲e have never taken this issue seriously,鈥 said Martin Olszynski, a University of Calgary resource law professor and former federal regulatory lawyer. 鈥淭hey have never taken these risks and these threats seriously.鈥

Imperial discovered 鈥渂rown sludge鈥 near one of its Kearl tailings ponds in May and it became clear over the summer the problem was significant.

However, the Alberta Energy Regulator didn鈥檛 update First Nations or inform federal and provincial environment ministers about the issue until Feb. 7, when it issued a protection order after a second Kearl release of 5.3 million litres of tailings from a catchment pond. Federal legislation requires Environment Canada to be notified of such leaks within 24 hours.

鈥淭he biggest learning from this is that the province has oversight and control over what information the federal government is receiving,鈥 said Mandy Olsgard, a toxicologist who has worked on regulatory issues for the Alberta Energy Regulator and Indigenous groups.

Ottawa joins in the review panels that assess projects then mostly back away, Olsgard said.

鈥淭hey just hand it off to the province.鈥

And then the province hands it off to a regulator that many consider too close to the industry it鈥檚 supposed to oversee.

鈥淭his regulator has always thought of its relationship being bilateral, between itself and industry,鈥 said Nigel Bankes, a retired professor of resource law at the University of Calgary. 鈥淣ever triangular, never a three-legged stool involving the public.

鈥淔or me, this (Kearl release) just confirmed all of that.鈥

That attitude is pervasive in the provincial government, Bankes said.

鈥淚t鈥檚 a general message of don鈥檛 rock the boat,鈥 he said. 鈥淚t permeates the department of energy and it permeates Alberta Environment.鈥

A survey conducted in 2021 for Alberta Environment found more than 85 per cent of Albertans had little confidence in the regulator鈥檚 ability to govern industry, in that case coal. The survey also reported Albertans found the agency reluctant to release information and was not very transparent.

Both federal Environment Minister Steven Guilbeault and his Alberta counterpart Sonya Savage have acknowledged things need to change.

鈥淲e need to take a step back and say 鈥榃hat are the processes? Were they followed? And do we need to enhance them?鈥欌 Savage said this week. 鈥淲e鈥檙e committed to taking the step to enhancing all of those processes.鈥

鈥淲e need to find better mechanisms,鈥 said Guilbeault.

But Marlin Schmidt, the Alberta New Democrat鈥檚 environment critic, is skeptical.

He said the province and the regulator have already refused to tell him the scope and timeline for the investigation of the leak. Savage wouldn鈥檛 commit to making the results of the investigation public, Schmidt said, nor would she promise to release results from an internal investigation into whether the regulator followed notification rules.

鈥淭here鈥檚 no investigation into what process led to the failure, nor any commitment to improving,鈥 he said. 鈥淲e鈥檙e just shrugging our shoulders and hoping next time things work out better.鈥

The Kearl situation shows it can be a mistake for the federal government to 鈥渉armonize鈥 regulations with the provinces and delegate oversight to them, Olszynski said.

鈥淕iven the kind of politics in this province, we could have seen that coming,鈥 he said. 鈥淲e should have known that these folks aren鈥檛 talking very well together, so you might want to rethink these arrangements that depend on them talking together.鈥

Olszynski said oilsands operators should now be required to report spills or any other unscheduled releases directly to the federal government.

鈥淚 think it is time for Environment Canada to take a much more proactive role in tailings management,鈥 he said.

The Kearl situation has made one thing clear, said Olsgard.

鈥淚t鈥檚 made it obvious to the public that there are not good processes between the provinces and the feds.鈥

Bob Weber, The Canadian Press

Like us on and follow us on .





(or

琉璃神社

) document.head.appendChild(flippScript); window.flippxp = window.flippxp || {run: []}; window.flippxp.run.push(function() { window.flippxp.registerSlot("#flipp-ux-slot-ssdaw212", "Black Press Media Standard", 1281409, [312035]); }); }
Pop-up banner image