There will be no injunction blocking three Fraser Valley churches from continuing to hold services in violation of ongoing provincial health orders.

Justice Christopher Hinkson, the chief justice of the B.C. Supreme Court, dismissed the province鈥檚 application for an injunction Wednesday morning.

鈥淭o be clear, I am not condoning the petitioners鈥� [churches] conduct in contravention of the orders that they challenge, but find that the injunctive relief sought by the respondents should not be granted,鈥� Hinkson wrote in his decision.

His ruling was founded largely on the grounds that the province didn鈥檛 need the courts to intervene with an injunction 鈥� there are already other powers the government can use to enforce the health orders.

He noted that in Chilliwack, RCMP officers had told the church members they could face 鈥渦p to six months in jail and massive fines, upwards of $50,000.鈥�

He also noted that in some recent cases, including an injunction issued by the courts against protesters at the Vancouver Port Authority, police and the B.C. Prosecution Service have declined to enforce the injunction once it was issued.

鈥淚 am left to wonder what would be achieved by the issuance of an injunction in this case,鈥� Hinkson wrote.

The court battle was started by the churches, who are being represented by the Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms. They petitioned the B.C. courts to allow them to continue meeting for religious worship.

The three churches are Langley鈥檚 Riverside Calvary Chapel, Immanuel Covenant Reformed Church in Abbotsford, and the Free Reformed Church of Chilliwack.

As the court battle continued, the provincial government applied for the injunction to stop church attendance, at least until the court case is settled.

An injunction could have allowed police to potentially arrest or physically bar people from attending the three churches.

Lawyer Gareth Morley, representing the Attorney General of B.C. and Dr. Bonnie Henry, argued last week that the injunction was necessary to stop gatherings after the three churches had all defied orders that closed churches for in-person indoor services in November.

The churches have , although local police and bylaw officers have not turned up every Sunday.

Paul Jaffe, the lawyer representing the churches, argued that there was no scientific evidence the churches were a risk to spread the coronavirus. He also suggested the banning of religious meetings was 鈥渧indictive.鈥�

鈥淢y clients can be detained on an officer鈥檚 belief that they are going to pray. It鈥檚 incredible,鈥� he said.

Morley had countered that the health orders were based on type of gathering, not on whether or not they were religious gatherings.

Read More:

Hinkson is expected to hear the main arguments between the two sides in a court case scheduled to begin on March 1.