Some school advocates within B.C. are cautiously optimistic following a $2 billion federal government funding announcement for school safety for the coming year.
B.C. will receive $242.36 million as part of the newly created Safe Return to Class fund, an amount in proportion to the provincial population of students, said Dean McGee of the Surrey District Parents Advisory Council, which represents the interest of Surrey parents in the public education system.
鈥淲e鈥檙e happy to see that it鈥檚 split by population, and now we want to see it split by district. We feel (our district) is always left behind.鈥�
In his announcement this morning, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau said the money can be used for anything from hand sanitizer to remote leaning options. McGee hopes some of the funds can be used for options such as paying for cleaning staff.
He said he鈥檚 heard from their district鈥檚 superintendent they have already 鈥渟pent more than $5 million on just cleaners.鈥�
A hybrid model of in-person and remote teaching is also a pressing need, along with larger classrooms with fewer students.
For those students who will attend in-person teaching, he believes more infrastructure such as hand sanitizer and plastic barriers are needed, particularly as many schools within the district use portables.
鈥淭here are 8,000 kids in portables - that鈥檚 a size of a medium school district in the rest of the province. When those kids go outside, they touch the doorknob to go to the bathroom, hopefully, there鈥檚 enough soap or sanitizer there, and then they touch the doorknob to go back in. We want to make sure all of that is up to scratch.鈥�
While the federal funds could go towards more PPE within the classroom, Gord Lau, chair of the Vancouver School District Parent Advisory Council explained it would be better used for developing innovative solutions.
鈥淭he instructions from the (Ministry of Education) is that within a classroom, we don鈥檛 want kids touching, but you don鈥檛 have to practise social distancing. If we have more funding, that鈥檚 okay but the messaging (around COVID regulations) is 鈥榯his isn鈥檛 required.鈥� The messaging around ventilation is 鈥榦pen a window.鈥� I don鈥檛 think that鈥檚 satisfactory.鈥�
Lau added flexibility in the provincial mandate combined with the funding is what is required - particularly for elementary students so that a hybrid solution can be implemented.
鈥淚 think that would make parents happier than more funding for PPE.鈥�
For Tracy Humphreys, chair of the BCEdAccess Society which serves students with disabilities and complex learners throughout the province, the funds could help with the flexibility of choice for students and parents alike.
In a recent survey done by the organization, 649 respondents out of 1,102 noted they are considering a different option from public, in-person school.
鈥淚 feel the loss of so many students with disabilities is a loss of great diversity and strength in the public education system,鈥� said Humphreys. 鈥淭he biggest finding we had is that students and parents and caregivers want to stay connected to the community school. Flexibility is key and we feel it is so important.鈥�
In a statement on social media, the BC Teachers鈥� Federation noted the funds can be used for smaller classes, reduced density, better cleaning and ventilation. They added the province should also provide remote options for students that need them in order to reduce density and support medically complex children and youth.
Black Press Media has reached out to the BCTF for further comment.
photos@comoxvalleyrecord.com
Like us on and follow us on
