A man who alleged that disclosure of his sex addiction led to him eventually being barred from a White Rock yoga studio has had his complaint dismissed by the B.C. Human Rights Tribunal.

According to a decision released by the tribunal on Aug. 23, there 鈥渋s no reasonable prospect鈥� that facts brought forward by Erik Rutherford against Westcoast Hot Yoga will be proven at a hearing.

According to Rutherford, the alleged discrimination began after he told a staff member he was 鈥渟eeking help with sex addiction.鈥�

Westcoast had countered that the steps against Rutherford were taken as a result of 鈥渉arassing behaviour that was rendering staff and other clients uncomfortable.鈥�

Tribunal member Emily Ohler found that, 鈥淲hile the timing could weigh in favour of Mr. Rutherford鈥檚 assertion that his disclosure of his mental disability factored into the treatment he received, there is nothing in the materials that could support a finding that Mr. Rutherford鈥檚 mental disability was a factor in the behaviour Westcoast points to as informing its decision to bar him.

鈥淩ather, it is reasonably certain the Respondent would establish its non-discriminatory explanation of having chosen to ask Mr. Rutherford to practice elsewhere because of his 鈥榗onstant harassing by text, email and phone to teachers and the studio鈥� with his allegations of gossip and his upset over the Coach not accepting him as a client at her business 鈥� behaviours that were causing conflict and discomfort for staff and clients.鈥�

At the time of the complaint to the tribunal, Rutherford had been a client of Westcoast for about eight years, the reasons state.

Ohler notes that Rutherford filed a complaint in June 2018 with the Better Business Bureau, after a Westcoast employee who has her own personal-coaching business outside of the yoga studio declined to accept him as a client once he told her he was looking for help with sex addiction.

The employee said it was not her field of expertise, the reasons state.

In the BBB complaint, 鈥淢r. Rutherford says that the Coach 鈥榙enied the writer help with depression, adjustment disorder and help with relationships,鈥欌�� the reasons state.

鈥淪he told the owner instead of offering help.

鈥淲estcoast says this was when things escalated.鈥�

Rutherford admitted, the reasons note, that he contacted the employee 鈥減artly due to my mental disability as she is an attractive healthy woman.鈥�

In his complaint to the tribunal, Rutherford said he felt comfortable speaking freely about his personal life because he was a long-standing client, and disclosed his previous struggles with addiction to staff 鈥渁t some point in 2017.鈥�

鈥淗e says that after this, staff began to be less friendly to him and alleges they were looking at him differently and gossiping about him.鈥�

ALSO READ:

He also complained that he was no longer permitted to purchase a five-class package that he had 鈥渞outinely鈥� purchased previously.

Rutherford further alleged that a Westcoast staff member who he ran into at a coffee shop in February 2018 said to him 鈥渨e don鈥檛 think you鈥檙e that healthy mentally.鈥�

He spoke with the studio owner around March 25, 2018, to 鈥渢ry to resolve the changes in his interactions with Westcoast.鈥�

鈥淗e says he explained that addictions and depression are common among professionals, and that practicing yoga helped him recover from his prior addictions to alcohol and pornography and he was now nine-years sober,鈥� the reasons state.

Westcoast officials told the tribunal that Rutherford鈥檚 mental health 鈥渉ad nothing to do with any of its actions.鈥�

鈥淩ather, the problem was that after the Coach declined to accept him as a client of her business, Mr. Rutherford began phoning, texting and emailing Westcoast staff at all hours, making staff and some clients uncomfortable. It says it asked Mr. Rutherford to stop but he did not.鈥�

Westcoast 鈥渁sserts that the reason he was ultimately asked to practice yoga elsewhere was when he failed to 鈥榮top harassing us with emails and false accusations against teachers.鈥欌��

Like us on and follow us on .