The disaster that was the Vancouver Canucks home opener left the fans angry, the head coach frustrated and the president of hockey operations pulling no punches when assessing his team on Hockey Night in Canada.

Jim Rutherford鈥檚 appearance on After Hours following the Canucks 5-1 loss to the Buffalo Sabres this past Saturday clearly put all members of the organization on notice that the team鈥檚 performance to start the season was unacceptable.

Even Bruce Boudreau, whom Rutherford has a good relationship with dating back to their NHL playing days, didn鈥檛 escape Rutherford鈥檚 criticism. One of the jobs of any coach at any level is to have his team prepared to play and Rutherford鈥檚 assessment was blunt when that subject was broached.

鈥淲e didn鈥檛 have a very good camp and it鈥檚 carried over into the season. We have a lot of bad habits,鈥� Rutherford told Hockey Night.

Rutherford then went on to criticize another area that the head coach has significant influence in 鈥� namely team defense.

鈥淲hen we talk about defence it鈥檚 just not the guys playing defence it鈥檚 a team defence and those guys aren鈥檛 getting enough support.鈥�

Rutherford even downplayed using injuries as excuses, and again, took aim at the team鈥檚 defensive structure.

鈥淚 believe if our team has a real strong structure you can play through those things,鈥� said Rutherford, whose team has used 10 defencemen through seven games.

Although never mentioning his head coach or Boudreau by name, Rutherford made it very clear that more was expected not only from the players but also from the man behind the bench.

Boudreau is in an interesting position in that he was inherited by Rutherford and Canucks GM Patrick Allvin, being appointed as the head coach on Dec. 5 while Rutherford was hired a few days later on Dec. 10. Allvin didn鈥檛 join the organization until Jan. 26. Usually a president is brought in, who then hires a general manager who then in turn hires a coach. That clearly wasn鈥檛 the case in Vancouver.

When asked why Boudreau wasn鈥檛 extended after last season in which he coached the team to a 32-15-10 record, Rutherford indicated that he was out of the loop on the hire.

鈥淗e came here and it was my understanding that he was going to get a contract for just last year. He got a contract really for two years and so he鈥檚 still got his contract. It wasn鈥檛 about that we extended him one year, it鈥檚 just that we lived by the contract he had. As I look at it now, it was the right thing to do. He鈥檚 got to work through this with his team, and at the appropriate time, we will talk to him about what his future is.鈥�

Even though he wasn鈥檛 his hire, Rutherford was on board with the move given those comments. The same cannot be said for Allvin. As with most GM鈥檚, Allvin would love to bring in his own guy but his authority is obviously superseded by Rutherford, who didn鈥檛 want to terminate Boudreau after his success of last year. And given Boudreau鈥檚 success, letting him go would have been a public relations disaster.

Boudreau does have some rope to play with but with every loss that rope becomes shorter. The follow-up 3-2 loss to Carolina on Monday saw the Canucks at least compete but you don鈥檛 get paid to compete 鈥� you get paid to win.

Veteran B.C. sports personality Bob 鈥渢he Moj鈥� Marjanovich writes twice weekly for Black Press Media. And check out his weekly podcast every Monday at or your local Black Press Media website.