Halting arms exports to Israel is 鈥渘ot a wise path鈥� and would only strengthen Hamas, Britain鈥檚 foreign secretary said Sunday.

Asked whether the U.K. would follow the U.S. in threatening to cut the supply of offensive weapons to Israel if it carried out an attack on the southern Gaza city of Rafah, Foreign Secretary David Cameron said the two countries cannot be compared because unlike the U.S., Britain supplies a very small amount of Israel鈥檚 weapons.

鈥淭he U.K. provides less than 1% of Israel鈥檚 weapons and it鈥檚 not a state supplier,鈥� Cameron told the BBC on Sunday. 鈥淲e have a licensing system and those licences can be closed if it鈥檚 judged there鈥檚 a serious risk of a serious international human rights violation.鈥�

U.S. President Joe Biden has said that his government will stop supplying weapons and artillery to Israel if its forces launch an all-out assault on Rafah, the last major Hamas stronghold in Gaza.

Britain鈥檚 opposition Labour Party and human rights groups argue that the U.K. should follow a similar position and stop the sale of British-made weapons or components in a Rafah offensive.

The U.S. government said Friday that Israel鈥檚 use of U.S.-provided weapons in Gaza likely violated international humanitarian law. But it added that wartime conditions prevented U.S. officials from determining that for certain in specific airstrikes.

Cameron also said that putting British boots on the ground in Gaza as part of international efforts to deliver aid would be 鈥渁 risk that we shouldn鈥檛 take.鈥�

His comments came after reports that U.K. authorities were considering deploying troops to land humanitarian supplies from a temporary pier being built by the U.S. military.

Cameron said that his government鈥檚 view was that 鈥渁ctually putting British boots on to the beach was not a good move.鈥� He said that instead, the aid delivery will likely be carried out by a contractor.

READ ALSO:

___

The Associated Press